| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
consigliarikb0
Level 3 dot.orger
Joined: 04 Feb 2007
Posts: 2811
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:12 am Post subject: Are we mathematically down? |
 |
|
Was away this weekend and missed the match, but I am assuming we are cut a drift at the bottom with only pride to play for?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UxbridgeR
Level 5 dot.orger
Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 5744
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I see what you've done there.
Personally, I think if we all get behind the lads and enjoy the game, everything will be fine.
_________________
In every dream home, a heartache. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Markybabar
Level 3 dot.orger
Joined: 08 Feb 2009
Posts: 2486
Location: Probably at work
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
_________________
I KNOW IAM, I'M SURE I AM, I'M RANGERS 'TILL I DIE! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Esox Lucius
Level 5 dot.orger
Joined: 03 Feb 2007
Posts: 9909
Location: Banbury, Oxon.
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Let i = the number of points available
n = the number of points we are likely to accrue using Poindexters 3rd law of probability and excercising the oblivion theory on our nearest opponrnts then we can safely assume that n-i + the square root of feck all spread over the refereeeing factor has us safely relegated as of last Saturday.
You're welcome by the way.
_________________
It's not the despair that will kill you, it's the hope. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
UxbridgeR
Level 5 dot.orger
Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 5744
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Esox Lucius wrote: | Let i = the number of points available
n = the number of points we are likely to accrue using Poindexters 3rd law of probability and excercising the oblivion theory on our nearest opponrnts then we can safely assume that n-i + the square root of feck all spread over the refereeeing factor has us safely relegated as of last Saturday.
You're welcome by the way. |
You've completely ignored the impact of Taarabt's quotient and Barton's by-product in your calculations.
I blame the abolition of grammar schools.
_________________
In every dream home, a heartache. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
222gers
Level 3 dot.orger
Joined: 10 Feb 2007
Posts: 1696
Location: LONDON
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="UxbridgeR"] | Esox Lucius wrote: | Let i = the number of points available
n = the number of points we are likely to accrue using Poindexters 3rd law of probability and excercising the oblivion theory on our nearest opponrnts then we can safely assume that n-i + the square root of feck all spread over the refereeeing factor has us safely relegated as of last Saturday.
You're welcome by the way. |
You've completely ignored the impact of Taarabt's quotient and Barton's by-product in your calculations.
I blame the abolition of grammar schools.[/quote]
Twelve hours a day, two hours for half term and we had to supply our own ink. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Esox Lucius
Level 5 dot.orger
Joined: 03 Feb 2007
Posts: 9909
Location: Banbury, Oxon.
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| UxbridgeR wrote: | | Esox Lucius wrote: | Let i = the number of points available
n = the number of points we are likely to accrue using Poindexters 3rd law of probability and excercising the oblivion theory on our nearest opponrnts then we can safely assume that n-i + the square root of feck all spread over the refereeeing factor has us safely relegated as of last Saturday.
You're welcome by the way. |
You've completely ignored the impact of Taarabt's quotient and Barton's by-product in your calculations.
I blame the abolition of grammar schools. |
I am afraid that you have forgotten your basic nonsensical maths; the two cancel each other out therefore they don't figure in the equation. I could have calculated for the Cisse dynamic but it would cloud the simplicity  of the original equation. 
_________________
It's not the despair that will kill you, it's the hope. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
UxbridgeR
Level 5 dot.orger
Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 5744
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Esox Lucius wrote: | | I am afraid that you have forgotten your basic nonsensical maths; the two cancel each other out therefore they don't figure in the equation. I could have calculated for the Cisse dynamic but it would cloud the simplicity of the original equation. |
My apologies. I was dropped on the head as a child, and the subsequent damage to my cerebral cortex has impaired both my nonsensical mathematical reasoning and my ability to appreciate creative mavericks. Or so the eminent neuroscientists that I drink with everyday at my local Wetherspoons tell me.
_________________
In every dream home, a heartache. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Esox Lucius
Level 5 dot.orger
Joined: 03 Feb 2007
Posts: 9909
Location: Banbury, Oxon.
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am also available for cod psychology analysis for a small consideration.
_________________
It's not the despair that will kill you, it's the hope. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
QPR_John
Level 4 dot.orger
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 4175
Location: Reading
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Esox Lucius wrote: | | UxbridgeR wrote: | | Esox Lucius wrote: | Let i = the number of points available
n = the number of points we are likely to accrue using Poindexters 3rd law of probability and excercising the oblivion theory on our nearest opponrnts then we can safely assume that n-i + the square root of feck all spread over the refereeeing factor has us safely relegated as of last Saturday.
You're welcome by the way. |
You've completely ignored the impact of Taarabt's quotient and Barton's by-product in your calculations.
I blame the abolition of grammar schools. |
I am afraid that you have forgotten your basic nonsensical maths; the two cancel each other out therefore they don't figure in the equation. I could have calculated for the Cisse dynamic but it would cloud the simplicity of the original equation. |
But what about Zamora's Hypothesis, as the name suggests not yet proven, but many believe it to be true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Esox Lucius
Level 5 dot.orger
Joined: 03 Feb 2007
Posts: 9909
Location: Banbury, Oxon.
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| QPR_John wrote: | | Esox Lucius wrote: | | UxbridgeR wrote: | | Esox Lucius wrote: | Let i = the number of points available
n = the number of points we are likely to accrue using Poindexters 3rd law of probability and excercising the oblivion theory on our nearest opponrnts then we can safely assume that n-i + the square root of feck all spread over the refereeeing factor has us safely relegated as of last Saturday.
You're welcome by the way. |
You've completely ignored the impact of Taarabt's quotient and Barton's by-product in your calculations.
I blame the abolition of grammar schools. |
I am afraid that you have forgotten your basic nonsensical maths; the two cancel each other out therefore they don't figure in the equation. I could have calculated for the Cisse dynamic but it would cloud the simplicity of the original equation. |
But what about Zamora's Hypothesis, as the name suggests not yet proven, but many believe it to be true. |
Is this the new fangled "If you buy enough strikers at overinflated prices you will eventually find one who can score regularly"?
_________________
It's not the despair that will kill you, it's the hope. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hunter S Thompson
Level 5 dot.orger
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 6291
Location: Ealing
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 8:40 pm Post subject: Re: Are we mathematically down? |
|
|
| consigliarikb0 wrote: | | Was away this weekend and missed the match, but I am assuming we are cut a drift at the bottom with only pride to play for? |
My head is in the gas oven as we speak
_________________
If you cannot bring good news then don't bring any. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DAVEf
dot.org vip
Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Posts: 21351
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="222gers"] | UxbridgeR wrote: | | Esox Lucius wrote: | Let i = the number of points available
n = the number of points we are likely to accrue using Poindexters 3rd law of probability and excercising the oblivion theory on our nearest opponrnts then we can safely assume that n-i + the square root of feck all spread over the refereeeing factor has us safely relegated as of last Saturday.
You're welcome by the way. |
You've completely ignored the impact of Taarabt's quotient and Barton's by-product in your calculations.
I blame the abolition of grammar schools.[/quote]
Twelve hours a day, two hours for half term and we had to supply our own ink. |
Loads of Grammar schools in Kent.
But no decent football.
Does that prove anything?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wrinklyhoop
2010/11 Sponsor
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 2715
Location: St Albans
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Esox Lucius wrote: | | I am also available for cod psychology analysis for a small consideration. |
Think you've gone too far with the fishing analogies there Esox old chap 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Keith
Level 2 dot.orger
Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 619
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
[/quote]
Loads of Grammar schools in Kent.
But no decent football.
Does that prove anything? [/quote]
Usually, yes. It usually proves the Webb-Ellis theory of ball-play divide based on socio economic dialectics.
But as there is no decent rugby down there either, I guess it proves you're all too busy renovating Oast houses.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Chat Room
Gallery
